Description
hardware flow control. It is an ideal choice in the field of industrial automation.
(5) Perform predictive maintenance, analyze machine operating conditions, determine the main
causes of failures, and predict component failures to avoid unplanned downtime.
Traditional quality improvement programs include Six Sigma, Deming Cycle, Total Quality Management (TQM), and Dorian Scheinin’s
Statistical Engineering (SE) [6]. Methods developed in the 1980s and 1990s are typically applied to small amounts
of data and find univariate relationships between participating factors. The use of the MapReduce paradigm to simplify data processing in
large data sets and its further development have led to the mainstream proliferation of big data analytics [7]. Along with the development of
machine learning technology, the development of big data analytics has provided a series of new tools that can be applied to manufacturing
analysis. These capabilities include the ability to analyze gigabytes of data in batch and streaming modes, the ability to find complex multivariate
nonlinear relationships among many variables, and machine learning algorithms that separate causation from correlation.
Millions of parts are produced on production lines, and data on thousands of process and quality measurements are collected for them, which is
important for improving quality and reducing costs. Design of experiments (DoE), which repeatedly explores thousands of causes through
controlled experiments, is often too time-consuming and costly. Manufacturing experts rely on their domain knowledge to detect key
factors that may affect quality and then run
DoEs based on these factors. Advances in big data analytics and machine learning enable the detection of critical factors that effectively
impact quality and yield. This, combined with domain knowledge, enables rapid detection of root causes of failures. However,
there are some unique data science challenges in manufacturing.
(1) Unequal costs of false alarms and false negatives. When calculating accuracy, it must be recognized that false alarms
and false negatives may have unequal costs. Suppose a false negative is a bad part/instance that was wrongly predicted to
be good. Additionally, assume that a false alarm is a good part that was incorrectly predicted as bad. Assuming further that
the parts produced are safety critical, incorrectly predicting that bad parts are good (false negatives) can put human lives
at risk. Therefore, false negatives can be much more costly than false alarms. This trade-off needs to be considered when
translating business goals into technical goals and candidate evaluation methods.
ABB 3BHE041343R0102
ABB PCD530A102
ABB PCD530A102 3BHE041343R0102
ABB 3BSE048845R1
ABB CI868K01
ABB CI868K01 3BSE048845R1
ABB 3BSE043660R1
ABB CI867K01
ABB CI867K01 3BSE043660R1
ABB 3BSE018135R1
ABB CI858K01
ABB CI858K01 3BSE018135R1
ABB 3BSE018144R1
ABB CI857K01
ABB CI857K01 3BSE018144R1
ABB 3BSE026055R1
ABB CI865K01
ABB CI865K01 3BSE026055R1
ABB 3BUA000037R1
ABB CI862K01
ABB CI862K01 3BUA000037R1
ABB 3BSE026055R1
ABB CI856K01
ABB CI856K01 3BSE026055R1
ABB 3BSE018106R1
ABB CI855K01
ABB CI855K01 3BSE018106R1
ABB 3BSE030220R1
ABB CI854AK01
ABB CI854AK01 3BSE030220R1
ABB 129740-002
ABB 3BSE012869R1
ABB CI520V1
ABB CI520V1 3BSE012869R1
ABB 3BSE018283R1
ABB CI522A
ABB CI522A 3BSE018283R1
ABB 3BSE010700R1
ABB CI534V02
ABB CI534V02 3BSE010700R1
ABB 3BSE022162R1
ABB CI535V30
ABB CI535V30 3BSE022162R1
ABB 3BSE014666R1
ABB CI541V1
ABB CI541V1 3BSE014666R1
ABB 3BSE012545R1
ABB CI546
ABB CI546 3BSE012545R1
ABB 3BNP004429R1
ABB CI547
ABB CI547 3BNP004429R1
ABB 3BSE001440R1
ABB CI570
ABB CI570 3BSE001440R1
ABB CI610
ABB CI615
ABB CI626
ABB 3BSE005029R1
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.